Tricks vs. Magic
I dropped by the magic shop last night, and witnessed an all-too-familiar scene. A young lad of about 12 was visiting the shop with his father, and wanted to get into magic. He was shown a dizzying array of card tricks, coin tricks, and mentalism effects. Each effect suggested for his purchase was a cheap, easy to use prop: a trick deck or something along those lines. I casually asked the kid what kind of magic he was interested in. He replied that he was new, and generally interested in everything. I recommended a single book; an encyclopedic work which would give him not only a foundation in magic, but hundreds of “tricks” he could perform. He left after buying a trick deck of cards and a booklet containing variations on the limited effects possible with the cards.
What bothers me about this experience is that this kid is going to go home and do tricks for his friends and family without a clue about the world of magic. His presentation (such as it is) will more likely than not present a challenge to his spectators, rather than an experience of magic. If the first trick is successful, he must decline doing anything else, because he doesn’t know anything else except maybe another trick or two with the same deck. Should a friend ask to see the deck of cards, he must refuse, without any graceful transition to another miracle which will divert attention from the deck. In short, what we have here is not a magician, but a guy with a trick deck of cards.
I do not worry that this trick deck will become “exposed” to members of the public; it’s already widely known, and yours for the asking and about $5 at any magic shop. I worry that his spectators will see magic as simple trickery, and not as an experience designed to temporarily free your mind from its daily routine and ordinary perception of the world. But even more, I worry that this would-be magician will quickly bore of his trick deck, and dismiss magic as a dumb hobby. All because his tricks do not inspire great reactions. Even worse, his spectators may encounter an experienced magician one day, and dismiss him as soon as they see a deck of cards in his hand, because they have “seen that trick already.”
While I usually try to tie in a magic topic with something relevant to daily life, I have no tie-in today. All I hope to accomplish is to relate the idea that magic is not about tricks. It’s about an experience. As I stated in a recent post, you must develop a relationship with the audience, and then you are free to provide them with an experience they will remember long after they have forgotten the “tricks.”






July 29th, 2007 at 3:32 am
Magic is definitely losing the young. The advent of the video game has taken dominance over anything that requires creative thought.
If nurturing a 12 year old into magic by having him or her do something with a trick pack generates more interest in magic than a book, I think keeping their interest is more important.
Instead of recommending a book, an offer to help them learn the trick they purchased may be more in-tune with what would create a follow up visit to the store and more interest. A push for the “new” magician to read a book may cause a lose of interest.
Video games don’t require in-depth reading.
Joe
July 29th, 2007 at 9:38 am
I can’t even get my adult friends to read!
:)
There are videos that can encourage more
“theory” that might influence a young
magician: Michael Finney and Eugene Burger
come to mind. Also let them watch that
multi-part history of magic series to inspire
repect for the craft.
You can set the blame for the dwindling
young magicians directly at the feet of
their elders. I usually buy some easy
tricks in bulk and hand them out to the
children of my friends. For 20 bucks you
can plant the seed of magic in the mind
of 20 kids.