Atheist Dogma
I was discussing the relative worthlessness of “debates” between rationalists and theists with a fellow atheist recently, and he expressed the opinion that it seemed like both sides just spew forth their own dogma, nobody considers the opposing opinion, and nothing positive comes from the effort. I don’t personally feel that debating is a waste of time, although it usually is for most of the audience because they already have their minds made up.
However, my main problem with his statement was that he referred to the position of the rationalist as “dogma.” As everyone knows (or should), dogma is a bad thing. It is taking a position as true and defending it regardless of whether there is any valid reason to believe it, and even when there is clear evidence against. The reasons I gave for the rational point of view not being dogma are as follow:
- They are based upon scientific consensus.
- They are subject to change based upon evidence.
- They are bolstered by an understanding and dismissal of pathetic opposing arguments, not a refusal to listen to opposing arguments.
All three of these are in direct opposition to the way a true believer thinks. They refuse to believe the results of scientific research when it conflicts with their beliefs, they won’t change their minds even when the evidence suggests their beliefs are flawed, and they refuse to listen to or understand opposing arguments.
So, just remember: “Beware of Dogma”
